If you want to start a lively discussion among a group of retirement experts, just casually toss out the question, “What’s the best age to start taking Social Security?”
The reason the answer to that question is so debatable isn’t because Social Security benefits are some vague mystery. Studies have shown that there is an optimal age to start taking them. But it’s because individual circumstances may well dictate that a person should begin claiming their benefit at a different age.
Before we look at the factors that go into choosing when to start claiming your benefit, here’s some quick background on how it is calculated. Basically, four components go into determining the monthly amount you are eligible to receive from Social Security: Your work history, earning history, full retirement age, and claiming age.
The Social Security Administration (SSA) looks at your 35 highest-earning years to calculate your full retirement benefit. Your full retirement age is the age at which you can begin receiving this full amount. (This can vary. For example, for those born in 1960 or later, full retirement age is 67.)1
You have the option of retiring early, for example at age 62, and receiving a reduced benefit. Or you can begin your benefit later than your full retirement age, for example at age 70, and receive a larger benefit.
The SSA has tables where you can see how much your benefit will increase or decrease based on your age when you start taking it. There’s enough of a penalty for taking it early, that waiting is an attractive option.
A study of 20,000 retired workers using data from the University of Michigan’s Health and Retirement Study, found that if the goal is “highest possible lifetime income,” then for a majority of those studied (57%) it would have been best to wait until age 70.
But just because this was the optimal age for a majority of people, doesn’t mean that this is the right age for everybody. However, it is good to know that the math may generally favor waiting until 70.
Knowing which age is best for you requires consideration of many personalized variables, including your financial needs, marital status, and health. Ultimately, none of us know exactly how long we’re going to live. And if you have a chronic health problem, you may not expect the longevity needed to make the delayed benefits pay off.
One other interesting finding of the retiree study mentioned above was how few of those studied actually optimized their Social Security benefits. Only 8% indicated that they were willing to wait to receive a higher payout.
Perhaps, if they had had someone sit down with them and explain their options, they might have chosen differently.
To avoid a similar mistake and choose the Social Security option that will make the most sense for your unique situation, be sure to talk with your trusted retirement planner well in advance of when you need to make a significant financial decision like this one.
If you ever have any questions about your investments or retirement plans, please feel free to give me a call at 801-545-0696.
Regards,
Mark Lund, Retirement Planner
Stonecreek Wealth Advisors, Inc.
11576 S State Street, Bldg. 1002
Draper, UT 84020
Sources:
1. http://go.pardot.com/e/91522/l-security-at-age-62-66-or-70-/94z3ql/2289680237/h/0JorWTbDAdkv2YtoykO8j9B3V8BlghW-uNJvLdLvrZQ
Disclosure: This information should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice and may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any Federal tax penalty. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. All economic and performance data is historical and not indicative of future results. Market indices discussed are unmanaged. Investors cannot invest in unmanaged indices. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. This material was prepared by Efficient Advisors, LLC (“EA’) for Mark Lund, Mark is a Financial Advisor in Utah. He is known as a Wealth Advisor, The 401k Advisor, Investor Coach, Financial Planner, Investment Advisor and author of The Effective Investor. Mark offers investment advisory services through Stonecreek Wealth Advisors, Inc. a fiduciary, independent, fee-only, Registered Investment Advisor firm providing investment management and retirement planning for individuals and 401k consulting for small businesses. Mark’s newsletter is called The Effective Investor Newsletter. Cities served in Utah are: Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah County, Park City, Murray City, West Jordan City, Sandy City, Draper City, South Jordan City, Provo City, Orem City, Lehi City, Highland City, Alpine City, American Fork City. The views expressed herein are exclusively those of Efficient Advisors, LLC (‘EA’), and are not meant as investment advice and are subject to change. All charts and graphs are presented for informational and analytical purposes only. No chart or graph is intended to be used as a guide to investing. EA portfolios may contain specific securities that have been mentioned herein. EA makes no claim as to the suitability of these securities. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. Information contained herein is derived from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. This information is prepared for general information only. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this report. You should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed or recommended in this report and should understand that statements regarding future prospects may not be realized. You should note that security values may fluctuate and that each security’s price or value may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive back less than originally invested. Investing in any security involves certain systematic risks including, but not limited to, market risk, interest-rate risk, inflation risk, and event risk. These risks are in addition to any unsystematic risks associated with particular investment styles or strategies.